The core argument centers on a shift in how universities are evaluated, moving beyond solely output-based metrics. It proposes assessing institutions on their capacity to *prevent* negative outcomes through applied knowledge. This raises the critical question of whether academics have a responsibility to proactively warn society about potential disasters. The piece suggests universities should prioritize anticipating and mitigating risks, rather than simply reacting after events occur. It implies a need for academics to be willing to publicly voice concerns and offer solutions while corrective actions are still feasible. Ultimately, it calls for a more proactive and socially responsible role for higher education in safeguarding against preventable catastrophes.