Three prominent international rights organizations declined to participate in parliamentary discussions concerning alleged pressure exerted on Supreme Court justices. The groups previously voiced concerns regarding potential judicial interference, but chose to abstain from the lawmaker’s forum. This boycott signals a lack of confidence in the parliamentary process addressing the sensitive allegations. The organizations did not publicly state their reasons for non-attendance, though their prior warnings suggest dissatisfaction with the scope or intention of the discussions. This move highlights growing concerns about the independence of the judiciary and the potential for political influence. The absence of these key observers raises questions about the transparency and thoroughness of the inquiry. It underscores the seriousness of the claims and the organizations' commitment to safeguarding judicial integrity.