South Korean courts are exhibiting discrepancies regarding when former President Yoon Suk-yeol allegedly began preparing for a state of emergency, specifically related to the December 3rd incident. Differing rulings across appellate courts suggest preparation timelines ranging from at least 2023. The core of the disagreement centers on the timing of actions related to the alleged “12·3 rebellion” and potential imposition of martial law. This inconsistency complicates the ongoing legal proceedings and raises questions about establishing a definitive timeline of events. The varying interpretations impact the assessment of the alleged actions and their legal implications. Further legal battles are anticipated as the courts attempt to reconcile these differing viewpoints. The case continues to draw public and political attention within South Korea.