6-8 sentences, max 300 words, neutral and informative.
* Format: `TITLE: <title in Spanish>` and `SUMMARY: <summary in Spanish>`. No extra text.

* Title: "The US deal with Iran: Trump crowns his failure." (Sarcastic/Critical tone).
* Text: "The agreement with Iran reads like a support program for the regime in Tehran. Europe can draw only one conclusion from Trump's debacle in the Gulf."
* Core message: The US-Iran deal is seen as a failure that benefits the Iranian regime, and Europe should learn from this.

* *Draft 1:* El fracaso de Trump en el acuerdo con Irán: un regalo para Teherán.
* *Draft 2:* El desastroso acuerdo de EE. UU. con Irán: el sello final del fracaso de Trump.
* *Draft 3:* El acuerdo con Irán: el coloso del fracaso de Trump y la lección para Europa.
* *Selection:* "El acuerdo con Irán: el sello final del fracaso de Trump y la lección para Europa" (Impactful, journalistic).

* *Challenge:* The source text is extremely short (only two sentences). The prompt asks for a summary of 6-8 sentences. I must expand the context based on the provided text without inventing facts, but phrasing it in a way that fulfills the length requirement while remaining neutral.
* *Key points to expand:*
1. The nature of the US-Iran deal.
2. The perception that it benefits the Tehran regime.
3. The characterization of the deal as a "debacle" or "failure" by the author.
4. The implication for European nations.
5. The need for Europe to draw conclusions.
6. The overall geopolitical context of the Gulf region.

* *Drafting sentences (Spanish):*
1. El acuerdo alcanzado entre Estados Unidos e Irán ha sido objeto de fuertes críticas.
2. Según el