Säverman recounts a history of purchased votes, suggesting the practice is not new. He references instances of individuals being transported to polling stations – *vallokalen* – by a baron, implying historical manipulation of the electorate. The discussion raises questions about the integrity of past elections. Notably, Säverman also asks why a bottle of vodka was consistently present in *Dagens Nyheter*’s (*DN*) booth, insinuating a past acceptance of bribes. This points to potentially unethical conduct within *Dagens Nyheter*. The narrative implies a pattern of questionable practices within Swedish politics and journalism, spanning across different eras. Säverman’s account prompts reflection on the enduring challenges of maintaining electoral fairness and media integrity.