The surrender of ISWAP commanders has raised significant security concerns regarding their true commitment to deradicalization. Experts and officials are questioning whether laying down weapons constitutes a genuine end to the threat posed by these insurgents. There is a emerging fear that while these commanders may have disengaged from active combat, they remain ideologically committed to their radical beliefs. This phenomenon suggests that the threat may have simply changed form rather than being eliminated. The situation highlights the critical gap between tactical surrender and psychological deradicalization. Consequently, authorities are facing fresh challenges in managing the same individuals who once led insurgent operations. The ongoing debate centers on whether these commanders can ever truly be reintegrated into society.</body>