Cornell University police investigated allegations of a gang rape occurring at a fraternity house, gathering witness statements and receiving related tips. Despite this collected information, the district attorney reportedly made the decision not to pursue charges without reviewing the evidence. This decision has raised concerns regarding the handling of the case and the thoroughness of the investigation. Investigators from Cornell University reportedly provided the district attorney with the collected information, which included statements from individuals with knowledge of the alleged incident. The district attorney's office has not yet commented on why the evidence was not reviewed prior to the decision. This lack of review has sparked criticism and questions about accountability in cases of alleged sexual assault at Cornell University. The incident underscores the importance of comprehensive evidence evaluation in such sensitive investigations.