The Church’s approach to discussing immigration policy in the West has been criticized for its abstract nature and tendency to present the issue as a simplistic dichotomy. This critique suggests the Church has largely confined its immigration discourse to Western contexts, failing to address the complexities of the issue with nuance. Specifically, the Church is accused of framing choices related to immigration in overly polarized terms, creating a caricature of the available options. This framing potentially hinders constructive dialogue and effective policy solutions. The criticism implies a disconnect between the Church’s theoretical stance on welcoming migrants and its practical communication on the subject. This limited and dualistic approach may not adequately reflect the lived experiences of immigrants or the multifaceted challenges of immigration policy.