A debate is unfolding in Chile regarding the security measures implemented by the government of José Antonio Kast, with concerns raised about potential authoritarian drift. Ramón Jara López argues that state coercion is not inherently anti-democratic, emphasizing the importance of legal frameworks and checks and balances. The discussion centers on a proposed constitutional reform regarding security protocols, specifically addressing the use of police powers and states of exception. While coercive tools can exist within a democracy, their application must remain accountable and limited. A key concern is the potential extension of states of exception up to 240 days without congressional approval, which could upset the existing democratic equilibrium. Jara López stresses the need to differentiate between legitimate state force and the unchecked exercise of power to safeguard democratic principles. The debate highlights the delicate balance between security and liberty in Chile's current political climate.