The government is promoting a quicker turnaround in asylum decisions, aiming to reduce a significant backlog. However, a lawyer has cautioned that this accelerated process potentially jeopardizes the thorough assessment of genuine claims. A key concern is the increasing number of cases being resolved without an in-person, oral hearing, which allows applicants to directly present their case. Critics argue that this practice diminishes the opportunity for adequate explanation and clarification of individual circumstances. While faster processing is desirable, legal professionals fear that expediency may come at the expense of accuracy and justice. The lack of oral hearings raises questions about whether applicants are receiving a fair chance to demonstrate a legitimate need for protection. This situation highlights a tension between efficient administration and upholding fundamental rights within the asylum system.