A proposed law regarding end-of-life care in France is facing criticism for its use of euphemisms and potential economic motivations. Specifically, the legislation suggests classifying deaths resulting from euthanasia as “natural deaths,” effectively concealing the financial implications driving the bill. This practice raises ethical questions about transparency and accurate reporting of cause of death. Critics argue this obscures a significant, yet unacknowledged, economic factor influencing the law. The editorial highlights concerns that the bill prioritizes cost savings over honest acknowledgement of assisted dying. This framing suggests a deliberate attempt to downplay the complexities surrounding end-of-life decisions and their associated costs. The author, Laurence de Charette, suggests the legislation is driven by economic pressures rather than purely compassionate motives.