Lawyer Ahmad Khozinudin, representing Roy Suryo, has criticized the recent arrests of Suryo and another activist known as Dokter Tifa by the Jakarta Metropolitan Police. Khozinudin drew a comparison to the case of Silfester Matutina, whose sentence has not been carried out despite a conviction. The lawyer’s statement suggests a perceived double standard in the application of justice, implying preferential treatment in Matutina’s case. This criticism comes amid protests regarding the detentions of Suryo and Dokter Tifa, raising questions about selective enforcement of the law. The arrests have ignited debate surrounding freedom of expression and potential political motivations. Details regarding the charges against Suryo and Dokter Tifa remain central to the ongoing controversy. The comparison to Matutina’s unexecuted sentence fuels accusations of bias within the legal system.