Proposals to reform Article 11 of the Constitution regarding abortion are being criticized as a step backward. Advocates argue that restricting abortion access does not protect life, but instead limits the rights of pregnant individuals. Legal abortion, conversely, is seen as crucial for safeguarding the health and integrity of those who are pregnant. The stance originates from analyses published by La Silla Vacía, highlighting concerns about the potential consequences of such reforms. Moving backward on abortion access is considered a regression in rights, rather than a life-protecting measure. The debate centers on balancing constitutional considerations with individual reproductive freedoms and public health.