Amadeo Leyba Ferrer distinguishes between a coup d'état – an abrupt power change backed by military force – and revolution, historically meaning a return to origins in astrological terms, now understood differently. This analysis appears on *TalCual*. Ferrer's distinction centers on the method of power change. A coup implies force, while revolution historically denoted cyclical return. This piece delves into the historical context surrounding the events of October 18th in Ecuador, questioning whether they qualify as a coup or a revolution. It explores the definitions of these terms beyond contemporary understanding. Further exploration of Ferrer's ideas can be found on *TalCual*.