A Swedish opinion writer argues that the government’s ex gratia compensation offered to doctors falsely accused in the 1984 murder of Catrine da Costa is insufficient. Bengt Edman contends the current offer is insulting to those wrongly implicated in the high-profile case. He believes a compensation amount at least five times greater than the government’s offer – a minimum of ten million Swedish krona – is warranted. The case involved accusations against medical professionals that were later proven false, causing significant reputational damage. Edman’s statement criticizes the government’s valuation of the harm suffered by the doctors. He asserts that the financial redress should reflect the severity of the wrongful accusations and their lasting consequences. The opinion piece highlights ongoing debate surrounding appropriate compensation for those falsely accused in criminal investigations.