The United States is exhibiting a pattern of behavior suggesting it only acknowledges the legitimacy of the International Criminal Court (ICC) when it investigates adversaries. Washington seems reluctant to accept the ICC’s jurisdiction when its allies are potentially involved. This selective approach to international law raises concerns about double standards in US foreign policy. Critics argue this undermines the principle of universal justice and the ICC’s authority. The apparent discrepancy between treatment of foes and friends fuels accusations of geopolitical maneuvering dictating legal considerations. This position challenges the established framework of international legal norms and could further polarize relations with nations that support the ICC. The situation highlights a complex interplay between national interests and the pursuit of global justice.