A South African court ruled in September 2025 that conservationist Fred Daniel was targeted in a campaign—allegedly led by former Deputy President David Mabuza—to suppress his evidence of State Capture in Mpumalanga province. Despite the historic ruling, the South African government has consistently avoided fulfilling cost orders and complying with appeal processes. This strategy of deferment and denial is now facing scrutiny, with legal experts suggesting the government’s actions may be unsustainable. The case highlights a concerning pattern of resistance towards acknowledging and addressing corruption revelations. The government's non-compliance risks further legal repercussions and damages its credibility. Daniel’s case is being described as "unique in our jurisprudence" due to the brazen nature of the alleged cover-up and the government's subsequent response. The situation raises serious questions about whistleblower protection within South Africa’s legal framework.