Slovakia’s Judicial Council recently held a public hearing to assess candidates for leadership positions at the Supreme Administrative Court. The session took an unusual turn when the topic of animals in the workplace arose, specifically regarding a horse. Beyond this, the proceedings featured criticism of the court’s recent foray into podcasting. One successful candidate voiced strong opposition to the podcast, arguing that a court should not function as an “influencer” and questioning the necessity of such a platform. The debate highlights differing views on modern communication strategies within the Slovak judicial system. This raises questions about the role of courts in public engagement beyond traditional legal channels. The hearing underscored a focus on both procedural matters and the evolving public image of the judiciary.