A recent court decision is facing increasing criticism from both legal professionals and the public. Doubts are being raised regarding the impartiality and legality of the appellate senate involved in the case of Dušan Kováčik. These concerns stem from multiple dissenting opinions regarding the original verdict. Two significant pieces of information have emerged, further fueling the controversy surrounding the ruling. Details regarding these new developments have not been fully disclosed, but they appear to reinforce allegations of undue influence and potential legal irregularities. The situation is prompting calls for a thorough review of the judicial process in this case and potentially broader scrutiny of the Slovak court system. The case and the surrounding controversy are developing and attracting significant public attention.