A Serbian legal expert, Tintor, asserts that even if the reported use of a sonic weapon was a simulation, it would not constitute a criminal offense, specifically an attack on the constitutional order. Tintor contends that simulating a crime is distinct from actually committing one, and therefore cannot be prosecuted as terrorism or a similar offense. The discussion arises from recent reports regarding potential sonic weapon use, prompting legal analysis of its implications. The expert emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between simulated actions and genuine criminal acts under Serbian law. This assessment suggests that proving intent to overthrow the government through a simulated event would be legally challenging. The argument centers on the principle that criminal acts require actual execution, not merely the pretense of it. This legal opinion could impact any potential investigations related to the reported incident.