The President of the Judiciary Union, Nemanja Đurić, has raised concerns regarding inconsistencies in the proposed judicial reforms, often referred to as the “Mrdić Laws.” He stated that the version of the law submitted to the Venice Commission differs from the text currently before the National Assembly. This discrepancy raises questions about transparency and the intent behind the legislative changes. The reforms aim to restructure the judicial system in Serbia, but details remain contentious. Đurić’s assessment suggests potential alterations were made after initial review, prompting scrutiny from legal professionals. The union is seeking clarification on these differences and their potential impact on the independence of the judiciary. Further debate and analysis are expected as the legislation progresses through parliament.