Following the withdrawal of a nominated minister, a former advisor to ex-President Traian Băsescu, Cristian Hrițuc, asserts the current President, Nicușor Dan, retains the right to propose another candidate. Hrițuc, a law graduate, argues the Romanian constitution lacks specific stipulations regarding re-nomination should an initial candidate decline before parliamentary confirmation. The previous nomination process, led by Tomac, wasn’t deemed a failure, but rather an annulment, according to Hrițuc’s interpretation. This interpretation centers on a perceived legal ambiguity regarding presidential powers in such circumstances. The analysis suggests the President has flexibility in navigating the appointment process despite the setback. Hrițuc’s perspective offers insight into the constitutional debate surrounding the situation.