Rhetoric specialist Christophe de Voogd examines the conceptual use of the word "independence" in public discourse. He analyzes how this term serves as a central mantra for those defending the judiciary and public broadcasting. The author questions whether the notion of independence has become a "totem of immunity" for these institutions. By scrutinizing the language used in these debates, de Voogd explores the tension between institutional autonomy and accountability. This analysis is part of a bi-weekly chronicle focusing on political rhetoric. The piece aims to dissect the specific words and concepts that shape current public arguments. Ultimately, it challenges the perceived absolute nature of institutional independence.