An allegedly late communication of an invitation, a meeting that ultimately sparked conflict, and the dismissal of Chancellor Manuel Tovar just 48 hours later—the case of Manuel Tovar leaves many questions unanswered. The situation suggests the President *was* informed of potential issues before they escalated. The sudden dismissal hints at a fallout stemming from the contentious meeting. Details surrounding the initial invitation and why it wasn’t apparently communicated promptly remain unclear. The swift action taken with Chancellor Tovar implies a significant breach of protocol or a serious disagreement. This event raises concerns about internal communication within the government and the decision-making processes involved. Further investigation is needed to fully understand the sequence of events and the motivations behind the Chancellor’s dismissal.