A recent assessment of polling accuracy in a recent election’s second round revealed an initial methodological error in the evaluation of polling firms. The firm Guarumo was initially ranked highest in accuracy, followed by Atlas and CNC. This assessment serves as a correction to previous evaluations. The article, published by La Silla Vacía, details the revised findings regarding the performance of these pollsters. The initial error impacted the understanding of which firms most accurately predicted the election outcome. Further details regarding the specific nature of the methodological flaw were not provided in the excerpt. The correction aims to provide a more accurate picture of polling performance for future analysis.