Slovak politicians, including Uhrík and Šutaj Eštok, are accused of misrepresenting the reasons behind the recent surge in migration to the Spanish city of Ceuta. The claim asserts that the politicians’ narratives diverge significantly from established facts regarding the situation. Details surrounding the events in Ceuta indicate a more complex reality than presented by these figures. This discrepancy raises concerns about the spread of disinformation surrounding migration patterns. The article intends to fact-check these politicians’ claims and expose the inaccuracies in their public statements. The story highlights the importance of verifying information, particularly concerning sensitive topics like migration, to promote a more accurate public understanding of events. Further investigation will reveal where their account differs from factual reporting.