Chile’s national reconstruction plan, designed to rebuild after recent social unrest, is under scrutiny for potential arbitrary discrimination and a lack of equitable access. Critics allege that the plan’s implementation favors certain groups while excluding others without clear justification. Concerns center around the distribution of resources and the criteria used to determine eligibility for assistance. The CIPER Chile investigation highlights a perceived imbalance in the program’s benefits, raising questions about the plan’s overall effectiveness and fairness. This raises concerns about potential legal challenges and demands for greater transparency in the allocation of reconstruction funds. Further investigation appears necessary to assess the extent of the alleged discrimination and ensure equitable recovery for all affected communities.