A recent analysis draws parallels between the domestication of dogs and the evolution of Latin American liberalism. The argument posits that, just as dogs were molded by human interaction over centuries, liberalism in the region has been significantly altered by political interests. These influences have led to adaptations, distortions, and a selective adoption of tenets, ultimately eroding the original ideological coherence of the movement. The author suggests a process of “shaping” and “selection” has occurred, prioritizing political expediency over consistent doctrine. This comparison highlights a perceived disconnect between the theoretical foundations of liberalism and its practical application within the Latin American context. The piece implies a critical assessment of the current state of liberalism in the region, questioning its fidelity to its core principles. It frames the evolution as a deviation from original intent, rather than a natural progression.