While U.S. efforts to broker a ceasefire in Sudan floundered, Gulf states, particularly Saudi Arabia and Qatar, have achieved significant progress through direct mediation. The Gulf nations engaged both the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in talks, securing multiple temporary truces – despite repeated violations. This success is attributed to the Gulf states’ willingness to engage with both sides without preconditions and their understanding of the complex regional dynamics. Washington’s approach, characterized by sanctions and condemnation, proved less effective in securing cooperation. Experts suggest the Gulf’s focus on de-escalation and pragmatic engagement, built on established relationships, created a more conducive environment for dialogue. This divergence highlights a shift in regional influence and the potential for Gulf states to play a more prominent role in resolving conflicts in the Middle East and Africa. The situation remains fragile, but the Gulf’s approach offers a contrasting model for conflict resolution.