A father has successfully won a court case granting him the right to decide which primary school his son will attend, despite opposition from his ex-wife. The judge’s decision centered on practical considerations regarding the boy’s daily routine. Specifically, the judge emphasized the significance of travel time to and from school, and the time required for the child’s morning preparations. This ruling highlights a focus on minimizing disruption to the child's schedule and well-being. While details of the custody arrangement remain undisclosed, the judge clearly prioritized factors impacting the boy’s everyday experience. The case sets a precedent for considering logistical elements in school choice disputes within custody battles. The court’s focus on the child’s practical needs proved decisive in the final judgement.