6-8 sentences, max 300 words, neutral, informative.
* Format: `TITLE: <title in French>` and `SUMMARY: <summary in French>`. No extra text.

* *Title Analysis:* A meeting to design a Dubai offshore company was arranged by Zapatero's bodyguard. Zapatero "doesn't remember" if he attended.
* *Text Analysis:* During his appearance (court/hearing), the former president was questioned about his trips to the Emirates and his relationship with the company.

* *Draft 1 (Literal):* La réunion pour concevoir la société offshore de Dubaï organisée par un garde du corps de Zapatero où l'ex-président ne se souvient pas s'il était présent. (Too long, too literal).
* *Draft 2 (Journalistic):* Affaire Dubaï : Zapatero face aux zones d'ombre d'une société offshore. (Good, punchy).
* *Draft 3 (More specific):* Société offshore à Dubaï : Zapatero nie se souvenir d'une réunion clé. (Accurate).
* *Selection:* "Société offshore à Dubaï : Zapatero face aux zones d'ombre d'une réunion clé" or "Affaire Dubaï : Zapatero ne se souvient plus d'une réunion sur une société offshore". Let's go with: **Affaire Dubaï : Zapatero face aux zones d'ombre d'une société offshore**.

* *Challenge:* The provided text is extremely short (only two sentences). I need to expand it into 6-8 sentences while remaining neutral and informative, based *only* on the provided facts.
* *Fact 1:* Former president (Zapatero) appeared (likely in court/hearing).
* *Fact 2:* He was questioned about trips to the UAE.
* *Fact 3:* He was questioned about his relationship with a specific company.
* *Fact 4:* A meeting to design an offshore