Even before the espionage scandal, August Hanning’s consulting work was considered dubious. It is not uncommon for former intelligence officials to profit from their expertise. The case revolves around Hanning’s activities post-retirement, raising questions about appropriate conduct. The Social Democratic Party (SPD) is now demanding stricter regulations governing such post-government employment. The principle guiding Hanning’s actions appeared to be “no risk, no fun,” suggesting a willingness to engage in potentially questionable activities. The scandal is prompting a broader discussion about the ethics and oversight of former intelligence operatives offering their services as consultants. Further investigation is expected to reveal the extent of the risks taken and benefits gained.