The debate surrounding a potential ban of the AfD (Alternative for Germany) has resurfaced following recent electoral gains. However, calls for a prohibition are being described as dismissive of voters. Experts argue that a functioning Rechtsstaat (constitutional state) possesses numerous legal mechanisms to address a government acting in violation of the law. Rather than resorting to a ban, focus should be placed on utilizing these existing legal tools. A ban risks alienating voters and could be counterproductive. The text suggests that addressing the issues through existing legal frameworks is a more appropriate and democratic response than outright prohibition, even in the face of electoral success by the party. Addressing extremism requires upholding the principles of the Rechtsstaat, not circumventing them.