A debate has erupted following comments made by Agnes Wold regarding transgender issues, with some claiming she is being unfairly targeted. Max Hjelm argues against this assertion, stating Wold is receiving justified criticism, not experiencing a “pile-on.” The core of the controversy centers on Wold’s views concerning conversion therapy – practices aimed at altering an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Hjelm questions the defense of such therapies, framing the debate as being *about* conversion therapy itself, rather than an attack on Wold’s freedom of speech. He suggests the focus should remain on the harmful nature of conversion practices. The discussion highlights the complexities surrounding transgender rights and the ethical considerations of related therapies. Hjelm’s commentary challenges the narrative of censorship, positioning the backlash as a response to the content of Wold’s statements.