A property owner narrowly avoided losing a portion of his land due to a court order granting a neighbor right-of-way access. A lower court initially ruled the land transfer was necessary to provide access to the adjacent property. However, the First Chamber of the Court overturned this decision. The reversal hinged on a municipal factor not initially considered by the lower court. This outcome preserves the man’s property rights and prevents the imposition of the servitude. The case highlights the importance of considering all relevant factors, including local regulations, in property disputes. The court’s decision ensures the property owner retains full control over his land.