A proposal to review convictions handed down by Colombia’s Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) through military tribunals is raising concerns about the country’s transitional justice system. Critics argue that such a move would disrupt the balance intended by the JEP and undermine its purpose of achieving closure for victims of the armed conflict. The JEP was established to investigate and prosecute those most responsible for serious crimes committed during Colombia’s decades-long conflict. Allowing military courts to revisit these cases is seen as a potential step backwards, potentially re-opening wounds and challenging the JEP's authority. Concerns center on the idea that military tribunals may not apply the same transitional justice framework as the JEP, leading to inconsistent outcomes. This situation has sparked debate about the future of accountability and reconciliation in Colombia following the peace process. The debate originated with reporting from La Silla Vacía.