A recent organizational change has sparked controversy, with accusations of a flawed procurement process. Optimistic interpretations suggest significant mismanagement, while more skeptical voices claim the situation mirrors the practices of the previous sixteen years under Fidesz rule. The core issue centers around whether the change was genuine or merely a continuation of existing patterns. Concerns are being raised regarding transparency and potential corruption in the selection process. Critics argue that despite the organizational shift, the underlying system of connected individuals and potential favoritism remains intact. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the transition and the commitment to genuine change within the procurement landscape. The situation necessitates further investigation to determine the extent of any wrongdoing and ensure accountability.