A former Department of Justice attorney alleges that investigations launched by the Trump administration into alleged antisemitism at U.S. universities were based on insufficient evidence. The probes, initiated amid concerns over free speech and discrimination on campus, reportedly had predetermined conclusions. According to the former attorney, the investigations were not driven by genuine concerns about antisemitism but rather by political motivations. This claim casts doubt on the integrity of the prior administration's handling of the sensitive issue. The investigations targeted institutions accused of allowing a hostile environment for Jewish students. The lawyer’s statements suggest a potential misuse of government resources and a politically-charged approach to enforcing civil rights laws. These findings raise questions about the objectivity of similar investigations moving forward.