The ongoing discussion regarding the new PSU is characterized by dishonesty and mystification. Critics argue that some proponents act as if they have a monopoly on supporting the poor. There is a prevailing belief among these groups that only the State can effectively practice solidarity. Consequently, private initiatives are often dismissed as mere charity. This tension highlights a ideological divide between state-led welfare and individual philanthropy. The debate reflects deeper conflicts over the role of government in social assistance. Ultimately, the discourse focuses on whether state subsidies are superior to private support systems.