This article, originally published by CIPER Chile, raises critical questions about the prioritization of scientific research. It addresses the fundamental issue of *who* determines which scientific endeavors receive funding and attention. The piece implies a debate surrounding the decision-making processes that govern resource allocation in the Chilean scientific community. It focuses on the underlying *reasons* behind these priorities, suggesting potential influences beyond purely scientific merit. The article likely examines the impact of political, economic, and social factors on research agendas. Ultimately, the text points to a need for transparency and accountability in how science is funded and directed within Chile. Further investigation into CIPER Chile’s coverage will reveal specific details of the prioritization concerns.