A defence counsel for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has accused Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja of selectively applying Section 122 of the Evidence Act during Kanu’s trial. Lawyer Onyedikachi Ifedi alleges this selective application impacted the proceedings against the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB. The allegation centers on the argument that the court did not consistently adhere to the stipulations within the Evidence Act. This claim raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the ongoing legal process in Abuja. Further details of the defence’s argument are expected to be presented, challenging the court’s handling of evidence. The case continues to draw significant attention regarding the legal proceedings surrounding Kanu’s detention and trial.