The provided text questions whether the Opposition's strategy of disrupting Parliament is counterproductive. By frequently stalling proceedings, the Opposition may be hinderingS undermining its own goals. Such disruptions often prevent critical issues from being debated on the floor of the house. This approach may lead to a public perception of the Opposition as obstructionist rather than constructive. Consequently, the government may use these disruptions to justify a lack of legislative progress. The recurring nature of these interruptions raises concerns about the effectiveness of parliamentary democracy. Ultimately, the text prompts a reflection on whether there are more effective ways to hold the government accountable.