The removal of home care support in Finland is being justified by familiar arguments revolving around the difficult state of public finances, increasing employment rates, and strengthening the position of women in the workforce. This decision has sparked debate, but the perspective of the child receiving care has been notably absent from the discussion. Proponents of the cuts emphasize the need for fiscal responsibility and greater female participation in the labour market. Critics, however, raise concerns about the potential impact on families and children who rely on this support for adequate care. The ongoing discussion focuses on economic factors and labour market policies, seemingly neglecting the wellbeing of those directly affected by the proposed changes to home care assistance in Finland. This omission highlights a critical gap in the current discourse surrounding social welfare policies.